|
|
|
In supply chain
types of business relationships such as those between a main contractor and
its sub-contractors, information flows generally coincide with business
contracts.
|
|
This should
enable the clear definition of roles and responsibilities, in terms of both
what data should be shared/exchanged, when, and by what means.
|
|
However, even
this type of arrangement has problems, with the main contractor having to act
as a clearing-house for communications, with its inherent delays and
associated costs [Thorpe, et al., 1998].
|
|
As projects and
design processes become more complex, the need for direct communications
between these supply chain partners is also increased, but no direct
contractual relationship between these parties is available to manage this
interaction.
|
|
This is typical
of the situation in a VE: The business contracts are between actors who often
have very little mutual communication.
The main information flows are between actors who are not
contractually linked.
|
|
This lack of
contractual support for the use of ICTs in VEs is highlighted by initial
results from the eLEGAL project.
|